IFBC Sparks Age Old Debate: Man vs Machine
Posted 7 years ago | Capper Reviews Report | 0 comments
International Football Betting Conference
The first annual IFBC was held in Costa Rica on August 4th of 2017, and it was a relatively small gathering of a handful of gaming industry executives, professional handicappers and media personalities.
The first speaker was Teddy Covers, who gave some solid advice about betting futures. Perhaps his most insightful comments were in regards to bankroll management. Teddy says: “Bet more when you are winning, and less when you are losing“. Great stuff from Teddy, he should patent that.
Perhaps the most interesting speaker was Ed Feng from ThePowerRank.com. He played on racial stereotypes, introducing himself as the Asian who is good at math. He claims that he’s used a PHD from Stanford to create a computer model that can successfully predict winners at a rate as high as 70 percent.
Could you imagine the possibilities? What would you do if you had a computer model that allowed you to win 70 percent of your bets? Take down a few casinos, buy an Island, date a Victoria’s Secret model? I am sure that everyone out there could think of thousands of things they would rather do than speaking at the IFBC, telling the sportsbooks how you plan to beat them.
Lets think about this for a second. The sportsbooks are the ones paying for this conference. They paid the airfare for everyone who came to speak today. If they thought for even a second that this guy had a computer model that would beat their odds, they would be paying him to keep quiet, rather than paying him to speak.
Man vs Machine
Ed Feng isn’t the first guy to come around claiming he can predict games using a computer program. This has been a common theme in the sports handicapping industry for the last 20 years.
There are a long list of handicappers who have claimed that their entire strategy comes from a computer program. Can you name any of them?
Chances are that the average person can’t name a single professional handicapper who picks games based only on a computer formula. Those same people are likely familiar with the names of traditional handicappers like: Jim Feist, Marc Lawrence, Ben Burns, or two time Hilton Contest winner Steve Fezzik.
This is not to say that statistics and analytics aren’t an important part of handicapping, but that it takes a certain expertise and human element to be a successful sports bettor. There are things you can pick up while watching a game that aren’t quantified by any statistics.
The reality is that if computers could beat the sportsbooks, it would be the end of sportsbetting as we know it. The books would be forced to close their doors rather than accept the heavy losses. If anyone truly had a program that was guaranteed to win, they would be a fool to speak about it openly.
Computer programs that beat the odds, are right up there with unicorns, hookers with a heart of gold, and weapons of mass destruction in Iraq.
3 months ago | Betting Previews and Predictions, NCAAF
Michigan comes in as the #1 seed, and Washington is the #2 seed. It's the fourth time we've seen the top two seeds meet in the Final, but the #2 seed has won three straight versus the #2 seed.
3 months ago | Betting Previews and Predictions, NCAAF
The Flames have beaten every team that was put in front of them, but this is such a major step up in class. Liberty ranked 119th nationally in strength of schedule, while Oregon ranked 9th.
4 months ago | Betting Previews and Predictions, NCAAF
For the first time in history an undefeated Power Five Conference champion has been left out of the playoffs. While Florida State fans are left reeling, the defending champion Georgia Bulldogs dropped five spots from 1st to 6th after losing by just three points to Alabama.
4 months ago | Betting Previews and Predictions, NCAAF
The Citrus Bowl will feature the Iowa Hawkeyes and the Tennessee Volunteers in Orlando on New Years Day. This certainly isn't the most highly anticipated matchup of the day. It has been said that watching Iowa's offense is right up there with watching paint dry.
4 months ago | Betting Previews and Predictions, NCAAF
While there was plenty of controversy about the four teams selected for the College Football Playoffs, nobody can dispute that these two teams deserve to be here. Washington upset the Oregon Ducks as a double digit underdog in the PAC12 Championship Game to finish the season with a perfect 13-0…
4 months ago | Betting Previews and Predictions, NCAAF
Michigan survived mid-season controversy and the absence of their head coach in their final three regular season games. They come into the College Football playoffs as the #1 seed with a 13-0 record after beating Ohio State and then Iowa in the BIG10 Championship Game.
7 months ago | Betting Previews and Predictions, NCAAF
This game has a potential revenge angle after the Tigers lost 24-23 on a missed extra point with zeros on the clock in Week 1 versus Florida State last year. Both these teams are ranked in the Top 10 in the country in the first edition of the AP Top…
8 months ago | Betting Previews and Predictions, NCAAF
Dabo Swinney's team is looking to return to the College Football Playoffs in 2023. Last year's 11-3 campaign ended with a loss to Tennessee in the Orange Bowl. Cade Klubnik threw for 320 yards, no touchdowns and a pair on interceptions on 30-of-54 passing in the loss.
8 months ago | Betting Previews and Predictions, NCAAF
The Hoosiers will open the season as a home underdog, and the bookmakers are giving them a four touchdown spread against Ohio State. The Buckeyes won 56-14 at home versus Indiana last year, covering the spread of -39.5. The Hoosiers have just two wins in the BIG10 the last two…
8 months ago | Betting Previews and Predictions, NCAAF
Boise State comes in as defending Mountain West Champions, going undefeated in conference play and winning 10 games overall last year. They didn't play any ranked teams last season, but they did play a team from the PAC12. They lost 34-17 to Oregon State in Week 1 of the 2022…